Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wellcentive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wellcentive

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

references are notices & not substantial. Fastest growing" usually indicate "not yet notable" DGG ( talk ) 08:52, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 09:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 09:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 09:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Plenty of available sources (see here) to establish notability per WP:CORP. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your link is to a page of Google returns consisting entirely of press-releases and in-passing mentions. The best in-article refs are financial- or medical-press pieces in the vein of "X company hired Y person", that read like press-releases given a little word-shuffling. Pax 10:57, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 01:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:ADMASQ. Pax 10:57, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORP for lack of independent reliable sourcing. The references in the article are press-release-based items in very minor publications - the totally routine type of announcement that "company x hired so-and-so" or "company x raised y million dollars". It may be that the company will gain coverage later; usually it's only very new companies that issue a press release every time they attract some funding. But for now, the coverage needed for an article isn't there. --MelanieN (talk) 05:41, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.